These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7709504)

  • 21. Responding to an accusation of malpractice.
    Gunderman RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 20193921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Deficient precision in medical treatment--role of the expert witness in the liability process].
    Probst J
    Unfallchirurgie; 1986 Feb; 12(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 3962010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Autopsy refusal and reversal of the proof responsibility in the malpractice process].
    Jansen C
    Pathologe; 1993 Mar; 14(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 8469647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Civil rights responsibility of the physician: content and limits].
    Laufs A
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):554-62. PubMed ID: 8588423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What we need to do to really reform health care.
    Tone TR
    Minn Med; 2010 Dec; 93(12):31-2. PubMed ID: 21265416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the legal expert].
    Weissauer W
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):48-51; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].
    Pelz FJ
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Liability in the hospital from the physician's viewpoint].
    Specht G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):620-2; discussion 623-5. PubMed ID: 8588434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Developmental trends in the malpractice process. II: Legal process and legal malpractice].
    Broglie MG
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1992 Aug; 47(8):371-6. PubMed ID: 1413930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The so-called specialist standard from the viewpoint of the legal consultant].
    Baur U
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 8588430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Medical responsibility. An overview of recent legislation (status: February 1994)].
    Kleinewefers H
    Versicherungsmedizin; 1994 Apr; 46(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 8197662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expert medical testimony is generally required to prove medical negligence.
    McCarter WD; Hayek TJ
    Mo Med; 2001 Oct; 98(10):488-9. PubMed ID: 11668860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical guidelines and professional liability: a short comment from the legal side.
    Guillod O
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(3):133-6; discussion 136-7. PubMed ID: 20714197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Accusation of malpractice in cardiovascular surgery].
    Schlosser V
    Versicherungsmedizin; 1992 Oct; 44(5):173-5. PubMed ID: 1441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Legal responsibility of the physician for treatment, organization and patient education errors].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):562-70. PubMed ID: 8588424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evaluation of medical malpractice claims: Creating a Standard Approach Model Using the Delphi Method.
    Doğan MB; Yükseloğlu EH; Doğan M; Uğraş SD
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Apr; 71():101932. PubMed ID: 32342902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Surgical treatment error and problems in its assessment from the legal viewpoint].
    Binder G
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(22):1445-9. PubMed ID: 3439380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint].
    Specht G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):640-1. PubMed ID: 9064939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Help me doc! Theories of admissibility of other act evidence in medical malpractice cases.
    Gardner J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Jun; (302):9-31. PubMed ID: 15379398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The physician and the malpractice accusation].
    Pribilla O
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1988; 46():27-36. PubMed ID: 3178671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.