These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7709504)
41. Gene technology in medical diagnostics and criminal procedure and liability for malpractice in Germany. Deutsch E; Füllmich R; Poppe H Med Law; 1990; 9(2):755-68. PubMed ID: 2122150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Medical testimony in assessing the legal responsibility of a physician in medical malpractice from the viewpoint of the lawyer]. Baatz G Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(20):863-5. PubMed ID: 3811429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. ["The severe degree of negligence" and its application in the settle of medical malpractice]. Wang YM; Zhang QC Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 22(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 16850605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Status and responsibilities of the expert in malpractice procedures]. Ulsenheimer K Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 2696707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The assessment of expert testimony relevance and admissibility in medical malpractice cases in the Czech Republic. Can American judicial practice help us? Zakharov S Med Law; 2011 Mar; 30(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 21528803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Behavior in cases of medical damage]. Ratzel R Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 2533927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Medico-legal aspects in anesthesia: how to lead a happy life. Tabbarah R; Tabbarah S; Kanazi GE Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jun; 18(5):985-94. PubMed ID: 17094539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass. Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP J Child Neurol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 23504251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Nursing competence--exemplified by expert assessment of decubitus ulcer prevention]. Jacobs P Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(4-6):78-83. PubMed ID: 12929311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Legal liability in consultation of physicians of different specialties from the legal viewpoint]. Biermann E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8588435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Forensic assessment of suspected medical malpractice and outcome of preliminary proceedings against medical practitioners]. Sandhop MW; Birngruber CG; Dettmeyer RB Arch Kriminol; 2014; 233(5-6):145-60. PubMed ID: 25004618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Physician competence in medical care]. Arnold K; Schuch HJ; Taut G Zentralbl Chir; 1991; 116(18):1093-7. PubMed ID: 1763580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint]. Kümper HJ Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):589-90; discussion 591. PubMed ID: 9064928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Improper medical care in traumatology practice (legal aspects, expert testimony and prevention]. Sergeev IuD Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1988 Feb; (2):47-50. PubMed ID: 3387058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Adversarial medical and scientific testimony and lay jurors: a proposal for medical malpractice reform. Menon JW Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(2-3):281-300. PubMed ID: 8571979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]