These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7709504)
101. The use of experts in medical malpractice litigation in Japan. Sakamoto N; Maeda S; Ikeda N; Ishibashi H; Nobutomo K Med Sci Law; 2002 Jul; 42(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 12201065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. [Perfectionism or practicability in osteosyntheses--limits of the carefulness responsibility]. Rehn J; Müller KH Unfallchirurgie; 1986 Feb; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 3962011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. A review on legal issues of medical robots. Shentu X Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 May; 103(21):e38330. PubMed ID: 38788002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
104. [Care responsibilities of the surgeon in the jurisdiction of the federal court]. Steffen E Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1984; 364():287-91. PubMed ID: 6503533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. What Standard of Care? Aicher RH Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Mar; 36(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 26628537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
106. The standard of medical care under the Australian Civil Liability Acts: ten years on. Lee J J Law Med; 2014 Dec; 22(2):335-49. PubMed ID: 25715536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Malpractice and medical liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation. Ferrara SD; Baccino E; Bajanowski T; Boscolo-Berto R; Castellano M; De Angel R; Pauliukevičius A; Ricci P; Vanezis P; Vieira DN; Viel G; Villanueva E; Int J Legal Med; 2013 May; 127(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 23564275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. [Organisational responsibility versus individual responsibility: safety culture? About the relationship between patient safety and medical malpractice law]. Hart D Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(8):504-9. PubMed ID: 19998777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. Fatal asthma: where did we go wrong? Priel IE Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):351-61. PubMed ID: 8231706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
111. The role of clinical guidelines in establishing competent professional practice. Pakchung D; Smith M; Hughes C Aust J Gen Pract; 2019; 48(1-2):22-24. PubMed ID: 31256452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112. Comparation between Cheng ZH; Zhang L; Wang L; Zhang J; Kong LJ; Yu L; He SY Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 38(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 35899501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
113. The art of apportionment: working out responsibility for health care misadventures. Bowen T J Law Med; 2014 Mar; 21(3):717-27. PubMed ID: 24804537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. RESPONSIBILITY, LEGAL AND MEDICAL. Br Med J; 1925 Nov; 2(3387):1028-9. PubMed ID: 20772239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
117. Good medical papers: whose responsibility? Can Med Assoc J; 1975 Oct; 113(8):707-8. PubMed ID: 20312687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
118. [The standard of required medical responsibility as an instrument in malpractice cases]. Schreiber HL Versicherungsmedizin; 1995 Feb; 47(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 7709504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
119. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits]. Deutsch E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
120. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process]. Ulsenheimer K Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]