These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7710795)

  • 1. Prediction of the time to peak hepatic enhancement to optimize contrast-enhanced spiral CT.
    Irie T; Suzuki S; Yamauchi T; Kusano S
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 7710795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic helical CT of the abdomen: prospective comparison of pre- and postprandial contrast enhancement.
    Sheafor DH; Keogan MT; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):359-63. PubMed ID: 9457186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique.
    Dinkel HP; Fieger M; Knüpffer J; Moll R; Schindler G
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1608-12. PubMed ID: 9866771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Three-dimensional imaging of hepatic and intrahepatic portal veins with helical CT: determination of optimal volume of contrast medium by intravenous injection using MIP technique].
    Uchida M; Shinagawa M; Sakai H; Onizuka Y; Nishimura H; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Jan; 60(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 10689885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT: correlation of the peak attenuation in the aorta abdominalis and portal vein with easily detectable clinical parameters].
    Bosch B; Alef M; Ludewig E; Hause A; Oechtering G; Kiefer I
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23403784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement.
    Irie T; Kusano S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 8708070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
    Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P
    Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT.
    Silverman PM; Cooper C; Trock B; Garra BS; Davros WJ; Zeman RK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7822552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of optimal time window for liver scanning with CT during arterial portography.
    Graf O; Dock WI; Lammer J; Thurnher S; Eibenberger KL; Wildling R; Niederle B; Lang EK; Lechner G
    Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8259425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bolus administration in spiral CT of the upper abdomen].
    Zwicker C; Langer M; Langer R; Keske U
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 May; 3(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8518308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.
    Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM; Dodd GD; Miller WJ
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 8115618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model.
    Bae KT
    Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Optimal dosage of contrast material in screening upper abdominal enhanced CT].
    Yokoyama H; Tsushima Y; Kusano S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Mar; 60(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 10741114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liver CT: a practical approach to dynamic contrast enhancement.
    Ditchfield MR; Gibson RN; Fairlie N
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 1445103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.