These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7713389)
1. Direction of causality. Carey G Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):473-5. PubMed ID: 7713389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Direction of causation models. Goldberg J; Ramakrishnan V Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):457-61; discussion 463-72. PubMed ID: 7713388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriate questions about causal inference from "Direction of Causation" analyses. McArdle JJ Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 7713390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferring the direction of causation in cross-sectional twin data: theoretical and empirical considerations. Duffy DL; Martin NG Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):483-502. PubMed ID: 7713391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [What can twin research reveal about the causes of diseases?]. Magnus P; Harris JR; Nystad W; Tambs K Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3317-21. PubMed ID: 10533416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advances in research based on twins reared apart]. Gao W; Li L Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 31(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 24928012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further considerations for power in sibling interaction models. Neale BM; Rijsdijk FV Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 16184493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do we need more twin studies? The Healthy Twin Study, Korea. Sung J; Cho SI; Song YM; Lee K; Choi EY; Ha M; Kim J; Kim H; Kim Y; Shin EK; Kim YH; Yoo KY; Park C; Kimm K Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 35(2):488-90. PubMed ID: 16423926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Twins in metabolic and diabetes research: what do they tell us? Vaag A; Poulsen P Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2007 Sep; 10(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 17693742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance. Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of half-sibling designs for detecting a genetic component to a disease. Tierney C; Merikangas KR; Risch N Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):523-38. PubMed ID: 7713393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twin studies in behavioral research: a skeptical view. Kamin LJ; Goldberger AS Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Feb; 61(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 11895384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A brief history of twin study methods]. Lorenzi F Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1997; 46(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 9862011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are your genes to blame? Pinker S Time; 2003 Jan; 161(3):98-100. PubMed ID: 12545574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Splitting the differences: problems in using twin controls to study the effects of BMI on mortality. Kaufman JS; Glymour MM Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):104-6; discussion 107-8. PubMed ID: 21150356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]