These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7713964)

  • 1. Nanoapatite and organoapatite implants in bone: histology and ultrastructure of the interface.
    Müller-Mai CM; Stupp SI; Voigt C; Gross U
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 7713964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporation and degradation of hydroxyapatite implants of different surface roughness and surface structure in bone.
    Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C; Gross U
    Scanning Microsc; 1990 Sep; 4(3):613-22; discussion 622-4. PubMed ID: 2080426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrastructure of the interface between titanium and surrounding tissue in rat tibiae--a comparison study on titanium-coated and -uncoated plastic implants.
    Okamatsu K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17535334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae.
    Masuda T; Salvi GE; Offenbacher S; Felton DA; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):472-85. PubMed ID: 9274076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial bone matrix formation at the hydroxyapatite interface in vivo.
    de Bruijn JD; van Blitterswijk CA; Davies JE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 7713963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The osteopetrotic rabbit: skeletal cytology and ultrastructure.
    Marks SC; MacKay CA; Seifert MF
    Am J Anat; 1987 Mar; 178(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 3578090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE
    Anat Rec; 1996 Jun; 245(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 8769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and ultrastructural appearance of the hydroxyapatite-bone interface.
    De Lange GL; De Putter C; De Wijs FL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Jul; 24(7):829-45. PubMed ID: 2398074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osteoblast-like cells complete osteoclastic bone resorption and form new mineralized bone matrix in vitro.
    Mulari MT; Qu Q; Härkönen PL; Väänänen HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Sep; 75(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 15148559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrastructure of the giant cell infiltrate of subcutaneously implanted bone particles in rats and mice.
    Popoff SN; Marks SC
    Am J Anat; 1986 Dec; 177(4):491-503. PubMed ID: 3544796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study between dense and porous hydroxyapatite using light and scanning electron microscopy.
    Pohchi A; Suzina AH; Samsudin AR; Al-Salihi KA
    Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():151-2. PubMed ID: 15468863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological evaluation on bone regeneration of dental implant placement sites grafted with a self-setting alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement.
    Nakadate M; Amizuka N; Li M; Freitas PH; Oda K; Nomura S; Uoshima K; Maeda T
    Microsc Res Tech; 2008 Feb; 71(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 17943986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Formation of osteoclast-like cells on HA and TCP ceramics.
    Detsch R; Mayr H; Ziegler G
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Jan; 4(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 17723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteoclast features of cells that resorb demineralized and mineral-containing bone implants in rats.
    Bagi CM; Miller SC
    Scanning Microsc; 1989 Sep; 3(3):963-8; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 2617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface: high-voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observations.
    Steflik DE; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Gardner LK; Hanes PJ; Lake FT; Berkery DJ; Brewer P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 8408109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.