These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7714748)

  • 1. Accuracy of numerical inversion of Laplace transforms for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation.
    Purves RD
    J Pharm Sci; 1995 Jan; 84(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 7714748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A nonlinear least squares program, MULTI(FILT), based on fast inverse Laplace transform for microcomputers.
    Yano Y; Yamaoka K; Tanaka H
    Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 1989 Apr; 37(4):1035-8. PubMed ID: 2766405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing PRED Subroutine of NONMEM for Versatile Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Fast Inversion of Laplace Transform (FILT).
    Jin R; Hisaka A
    Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2020 Sep; 68(9):891-894. PubMed ID: 32611991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharmacokinetic curve fitting using numerical inverse Laplace transformation.
    Schalla M; Weiss M
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 1999 Mar; 7(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 9971913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-level time-domain decomposition based distributed method for numerical solutions of pharmacokinetic models.
    Liu L; Lai CH; Zhou SD; Xie F; Rui L
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Apr; 41(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 21396631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.
    Savic RM; Mentré F; Lavielle M
    AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 21063925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Disposition analysis by fast inverse Laplace transform (FILT)].
    Yamaoka K
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 112(8):503-15. PubMed ID: 1432601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of full waveform inversion algorithm in Laplace-Fourier domain for high-contrast ultrasonic bone quantitative imaging.
    Suo M; Zhang D; Yang H; Yang Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Apr; 231():107404. PubMed ID: 36758266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters by orthogonal regression: comparison of four algorithms.
    Tod M; Aouimer A; Petitjean O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jan; 67(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 11750944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel estimation method for physiological parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application of a distributed parameter model using Fourier-domain calculations.
    Garpebring A; Ostlund N; Karlsson M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1375-83. PubMed ID: 19278930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved numerical stability for the bounded integer model.
    Ueckert S; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2021 Apr; 48(2):241-251. PubMed ID: 33242184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimations by minimum relative entropy method.
    Amisaki T; Eguchi S
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1995 Oct; 23(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 8656343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical solution of Nye-Tinker-Barber model by Laplace transform.
    Wang Y; Lin W; Ou Z
    Biosystems; 2023 Mar; 225():104845. PubMed ID: 36764382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Evolutionary Search Algorithm for Covariate Models in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.
    Yamashita F; Fujita A; Sasa Y; Higuchi Y; Tsuda M; Hashida M
    J Pharm Sci; 2017 Sep; 106(9):2407-2411. PubMed ID: 28450239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.
    Savic R; Lavielle M
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 19680795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of multiple-trough sampling design and algorithm on the estimation of population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters].
    Ling J; Qian LX; Ding JJ; Jiao Z
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2014 May; 49(5):686-94. PubMed ID: 25151742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can you trust the parametric standard errors in nonlinear least squares? Yes, with provisos.
    Tellinghuisen J
    Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2018 Apr; 1862(4):886-894. PubMed ID: 29289616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculating the hybrid (macro) rate constants of a three-compartment mamillary pharmacokinetic model from known micro-rate constants.
    Upton RN
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2004; 49(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 14670695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.