245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7714857)
1. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of the diagnostic contribution of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 75(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 8151557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of diagnostic procedures].
Strnad L; Kruparzh V; Ulybin B
Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1989; 32(1):9-29. PubMed ID: 2678419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tools for the evaluation of diagnostic techniques].
Grenier B
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 Apr; 39(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 2062557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical methods for evidence-based medicine: the diagnostic test. Part II.
Antonelli P; Chiumello D; Cesana BM
Minerva Anestesiol; 2008 Sep; 74(9):481-8. PubMed ID: 18356804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The misuse of predictive value--or why you must consider the odds.
Gambino R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 1809058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Fardy JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of the predictive value model in the analysis of test effectiveness.
Galen RS
Clin Lab Med; 1982 Dec; 2(4):685-99. PubMed ID: 7160151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
Gjørup T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
