585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7714976)
1. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One core positive prostate biopsy is a poor predictor of cancer volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Wang X; Brannigan RE; Rademaker AW; McVary KT; Oyasu R
J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1431-5. PubMed ID: 9302137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Sanderson H; Carter HB; Scharfstein DO
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 16040085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
