These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7715344)

  • 1. External examiners.
    Walters WA; Sivanesaratnam V; Hamilton JD
    Lancet; 1995 Apr; 345(8957):1093-5. PubMed ID: 7715344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking in Australia using the International Foundations of Medicine Clinical Science Examination.
    Ryan AT; O'Mara DA; Siddiqui ZS; Ward HM; Fraser JD
    Med J Aust; 2016 May; 204(9):345. PubMed ID: 27169965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Undergraduate institutional MCAT scores as predictors of USMLE step 1 performance.
    Basco WT; Way DP; Gilbert GE; Hudson A
    Acad Med; 2002 Oct; 77(10 Suppl):S13-6. PubMed ID: 12377692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sooner or later? USMLE step 1 performance and test administration date at the end of the second year.
    Pohl CA; Robeson MR; Hojat M; Veloski JJ
    Acad Med; 2002 Oct; 77(10 Suppl):S17-9. PubMed ID: 12377693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying students at risk for poor performance on the USMLE Step 2.
    Ripkey DR; Case SM; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S45-8. PubMed ID: 10536590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning medical ethics in a primary care clinic.
    Loh KY; Nalliah S
    Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1127-8. PubMed ID: 18991988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Necessity of Uniform USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Score Reporting.
    Bennett WC; Parton TK; Beck Dallaghan GL
    Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):163. PubMed ID: 33492822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining undergraduate examinations.
    Weatherall DJ
    Lancet; 1991 Jul; 338(8758):37-9. PubMed ID: 1676093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global benchmarking of medical student learning outcomes? Implementation and pilot results of the International Foundations of Medicine Clinical Sciences Exam at The University of Queensland, Australia.
    Wilkinson D; Schafer J; Hewett D; Eley D; Swanson D
    Med Teach; 2014 Jan; 36(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 24164636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Passing standards for undergraduate primary care examinations at UK medical schools.
    Hancock J; Blythe A
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Mar; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 21439146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal vulnerability of the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
    Swanson DB; Bowles LT
    Eval Health Prof; 1996 Dec; 19(4):412-22. PubMed ID: 10186924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting standards.
    Leinster S
    Lancet; 2004 Feb; 363(9407):496. PubMed ID: 14962545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are national qualifying examinations a fair way to rank medical students? No.
    Noble IS
    BMJ; 2008 Aug; 337():a1279. PubMed ID: 18723556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modified essay question: its exit from the exit examination?
    Palmer EJ; Duggan P; Devitt PG; Russell R
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(7):e300-7. PubMed ID: 20653373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are national qualifying examinations a fair way to rank medical students? Yes.
    Ricketts C; Archer J
    BMJ; 2008 Aug; 337():a1282. PubMed ID: 18723557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple choice questions in Sudan medical schools.
    Elfaki EA
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Dec; 21(12):1197. PubMed ID: 11360103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why does the MRCPsych examination need to change?
    Tyrer S; Oyebode F
    Br J Psychiatry; 2004 Mar; 184():197-9. PubMed ID: 14990516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Testing of the cumulative knowledge should be tried nationally].
    Korhonen M
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(20):2244-5. PubMed ID: 12017631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting standards: quality in accreditation.
    Browne J
    Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):1017. PubMed ID: 22989136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is accreditation a true reflection of quality?
    Al Alwan I
    Med Educ; 2012 Jun; 46(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 22626045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.