These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7715570)

  • 1. Calculation of monitor units for a linear accelerator with asymmetric jaws.
    Rosenberg I; Chu JC; Saxena V
    Med Phys; 1995 Jan; 22(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 7715570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface and peripheral doses of dynamic and physical wedges.
    Li Z; Klein EE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):921-5. PubMed ID: 9128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry of wedged fields with asymmetric collimation.
    Khan FM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1447-51. PubMed ID: 8289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verification of a simple point dose calculation method for a dual energy linear accelerator with asymmetric jaws.
    Lee PC
    Med Dosim; 1996; 21(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 8985928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling photon output caused by backscattered radiation into the monitor chamber from collimator jaws using a Monte Carlo technique.
    Liu HH; Mackie TR; McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 2000 Apr; 27(4):737-44. PubMed ID: 10798696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose calculations for asymmetric fields defined by independent collimators using symmetric field data.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Xenofos S; Papalexopoulos A; Nikoletopoulos S
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):403-9. PubMed ID: 10844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose calculation for asymmetric photon fields with independent jaws and multileaf collimators.
    Araki F; Ikeda R; Moribe N; Shirakawa Y; Hatemura M; Shimonobou T; Hirata Y; Takada T; Takahashi M; Matoba M
    Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 10718137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetry for asymmetric x-ray fields.
    Kwa W; Kornelsen RO; Harrison RW; el-Khatib E
    Med Phys; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1599-604. PubMed ID: 7869992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose computations for asymmetric fields defined by independent jaws.
    Chui CS; Mohan R; Fontenla D
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 3127669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric characteristics of a 6 MV photon beam from a linear accelerator with asymmetric collimator jaws.
    Palta JR; Ayyangar KM; Suntharalingam N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1988 Feb; 14(2):383-7. PubMed ID: 3338959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the extrafocal radiation and monitor chamber backscatter for photon beam dose calculation.
    Jiang SB; Boyer AL; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 11213923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric characterization of the 18-MV photon beam from the Siemens Mevatron 77 linear accelerator.
    Palta JR; Meyer JA; Hogstrom KR
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 6438461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling the truebeam linac using a CAD to Geant4 geometry implementation: dose and IAEA-compliant phase space calculations.
    Constantin M; Perl J; LoSasso T; Salop A; Whittum D; Narula A; Svatos M; Keall PJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4018-24. PubMed ID: 21858999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.
    van der Zee W; Welleweerd J
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 12033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extrafocal radiation: a unified approach to the prediction of beam penumbra and output factors for megavoltage x-ray beams.
    Sharpe MB; Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2065-74. PubMed ID: 8746712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.
    Wiezorek T; Voigt A; Metzger N; Georg D; Schwedas M; Salz H; Wendt TG
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 18259698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pulse-rate dependence of dose per monitor unit and its significant effect on wedged-shaped fields delivered with variable dose rate and a moving jaw.
    Faddegon BA; Garde E
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3063-5. PubMed ID: 16964884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wedge factor dependence on depth and field size for various beam energies using symmetric and half-collimated asymmetric jaw settings.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Haleem M; Rodgers J; Obcemea C
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1445-50. PubMed ID: 1461208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.