These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7716013)

  • 41. The new pay scales.
    Nurs Times; 1988 Apr 27-May 3; 84(17):16-8. PubMed ID: 3375088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pay: when some are more equal.
    Dimmock S
    Nurs Times; 1985 Oct 23-29; 80(43):18-9. PubMed ID: 3851343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Speakman on top nurses' pay. Why aren't equal salaries proposed.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jul; 149(2):6. PubMed ID: 257582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Satisfaction with pay: changing nurses' pay.
    Seccombeand I; Ball J
    Nurs Stand; 1993 Mar 17-23; 7(26):22-3. PubMed ID: 8481310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nurses' pay: lifting the lower grades.
    Gray J; Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Sep; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 2510005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The case to answer. Pay review body evidence.
    Carlisle D
    Nurs Times; 1994 Sep 28-Oct 4; 90(39):18-9. PubMed ID: 7971340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nurses' pay: what the government said.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1988 Feb 10-16; 84(6):20. PubMed ID: 3353252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Pay: the knock-on effect.
    Gray A
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jan 30-Feb 5; 81(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 3919362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The hidden costs of the pay rise.
    Buchan J
    Nurs Times; 1988 May 4-10; 84(18):19. PubMed ID: 3380706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nurses' pay: a stage-managed award.
    Nurs Stand; 1990 Feb 7-13; 4(20):20-1. PubMed ID: 2107440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Putting pay in its place.
    Buchan J
    Nurs Times; 1988 Nov 9-15; 84(45):20. PubMed ID: 3205770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pay: nurses' 'irrefutable' case.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 29-Mar 6; 80(9):21. PubMed ID: 6561591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stonewall Ennals and top nurses' pay.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Apr; 146(17):10. PubMed ID: 247396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pay special. Yes, Prime Minister.
    Casey N
    Nurs Stand; 1995 Mar 15-21; 9(25):18-9. PubMed ID: 7727236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nurses' pay: striking the right balance on nurses' pay.
    Vaughan G
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Jan; 154(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 6915534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.