BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7717234)

  • 1. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
    Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI of soft-tissue tumors: fast STIR sequence as substitute for T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequence.
    Tokuda O; Harada Y; Matsunaga N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1607-14. PubMed ID: 19933655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors.
    Kataoka M; Ueda H; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Togashi K; Asato R; Tanaka S; Ito J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):313-9. PubMed ID: 15615994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved contrast of enhancing brain lesions using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.
    Melhem ER; Guidone PL; Jara H; Yucel EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):1091-5. PubMed ID: 9124121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
    Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Fok EC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
    Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.
    Mirowitz SA; Apicella P; Reinus WR; Hammerman AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 8273669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of temporomandibular disorders: improved lesion detection of the posterior disk attachment on T1-weighted images obtained with fat suppression.
    Suenaga S; Abeyama K; Noikura T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):511-7. PubMed ID: 9694485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin-echo t2 versus respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo T2 in clinical hepatic imaging.
    Huang J; Raman SS; Vuong N; Sayre JW; Lu DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):842-6. PubMed ID: 15728606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of T1 shortening on T2-weighted MRI sequences: comparison of hepatic mass conspicuity on images acquired before and after gadolinium enhancement.
    Chang SD; Thoeni RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18430850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of optimized gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in revealing lesions of the brain.
    Melhem ER; Bert RJ; Walker RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):803-7. PubMed ID: 9725320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Periarticular bone findings in rheumatoid arthritis: T2-weighted versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.
    Yao L; Magalnick M; Wilson M; Lipsky P; Goldbach-Mansky R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 16861538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.