These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7717271)

  • 1. Evaluation of standard and modified sampling heads for the International PBI Surface Air System bioaerosol samplers.
    Jensen PA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Mar; 56(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 7717271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
    Lindsley WG; Schmechel D; Chen BT
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 17075620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
    Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
    Lee KS; Teschke K; Brauer M; Bartlett KH
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
    Bellin P; Schillinger J
    Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M.
    Görner P; Fabriès JF; Duquenne P; Witschger O; Wrobel R
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16395458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of small evacuated canisters equipped with a novel flow controller for the collection of personal air samples.
    Rossner A; Warner SD; Vyskocil A; Tardif R; Farant JP
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Mar; 1(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 15204875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a passive aerosol sampler to size-selective pump samplers in indoor environments.
    Wagner J; Macher JM
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 14521436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.