These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7718925)

  • 1. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a review of empirical studies.
    Ladds B; Convit A
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):519-32. PubMed ID: 7718925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The disposition of criminal charges after involuntary medication to restore competency to stand trial.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    J Forensic Sci; 1993 Nov; 38(6):1442-59. PubMed ID: 7903350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involuntary electro-convulsive therapy to restore competency to stand trial: a five year study in New York State.
    Ladds B
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Mar; 40(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 7602274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary medication treatment for competency restoration of 22 defendants with delusional disorder.
    Herbel BL; Stelmach H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 17389345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
    Hilgers K; Ramer P
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
    Feinberg A
    Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criminal procedure--substantive due process--D.C. Circuit holds that the government may forcibly treat incompetent criminal defendants with antipsychotic medication to render them competent to stand trial. --United States v. Weston, 255 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2001), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Sept. 5, 2001) (No. 01-6161).
    Harv Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 115(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 11958231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?
    Gerbasi JB; Scott CL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15497635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
    Saks ER
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.