These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7720158)
21. Airway Scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a manikin study. Hirabayashi Y Emerg Med J; 2007 May; 24(5):357-8. PubMed ID: 17452706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades. Evans A; Vaughan RS; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh J; Wilkes AR Anaesthesia; 2003 Sep; 58(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 12911359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reshaping the Macintosh blade using biomechanical modelling. A prospective comparative study in patients. Bucx MJ; Snijders CJ; ven der Vegt MH; Holstein JD; Stijnen T Anaesthesia; 1997 Jul; 52(7):662-7. PubMed ID: 9244026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation. Saracoglu KT; Eti Z; Kavas AD; Umuroglu T Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 24(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24215652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins. Lee C; Russell T; Firat M; Cooper RM Anaesthesia; 2013 May; 68(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 23573844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct versus video laryngoscopic intubation by novice prehospital intubators with and without chest compressions: A pilot manikin study. Kim YM; Kang HG; Kim JH; Chung HS; Yim HW; Jeong SH Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21034232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. Malik MA; Hassett P; Carney J; Higgins BD; Harte BH; Laffey JG Can J Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 56(11):802-11. PubMed ID: 19655213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tracheal Intubation with a McGrath® Series 5 Video Laryngoscope by Novice Personnel in a Cervical-immobilized Manikin. Choi JW; Kim JA; Jung HJ; Kim WH J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 50(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 26432080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inverse intubation in entrapped trauma casualties: a simulator based, randomised cross-over comparison of direct, indirect and video laryngoscopy. Schober P; Krage R; van Groeningen D; Loer SA; Schwarte LA Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):959-63. PubMed ID: 24005641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of results from novice and trained personnel using the Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax AWS®, C-MAC™ and Bonfils intubation fibrescope: a manikin study. Lye ST; Liaw CM; Seet E; Koh KF Singapore Med J; 2013 Feb; 54(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 23462828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the new Viewmax laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway. Leung YY; Hung CT; Tan ST Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 May; 50(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 16643225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of different intubation techniques performed inside a moving ambulance: a manikin study. Wong KB; Lui CT; Chan WY; Lau TL; Tang SY; Tsui KL Hong Kong Med J; 2014 Aug; 20(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 24914074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study. Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of a suction laryngoscope in a model with simulated severe airway hemorrhage. Mitterlechner T; Nerbl N; Herff H; Paal P; Moritz M; Kloss F; Lindner KH; Wenzel V Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1505-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18420868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy. Russell T; Khan S; Elman J; Katznelson R; Cooper RM Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 22352799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tracheal intubation of a difficult airway using Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel. Liu L; Tanigawa K; Kusunoki S; Tamura T; Ota K; Yamaga S; Kida Y; Otani T; Sadamori T; Takeda T; Iwasaki Y; Hirohashi N Anesth Analg; 2010 Apr; 110(4):1049-55. PubMed ID: 20357149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimum and optimum light requirements for laryngoscopy in paediatric anaesthesia: a manikin study. Malan CA; Scholz A; Wilkes AR; Hampson MA; Hall JE Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18086072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sex Disparities in Applied Force on Maxillary Incisors Among Novices During Laryngoscopy Using a High-Fidelity Simulator: A Prospective Observational Study. Ono Y; Shinohara K; Shimada J; Sugiyama J; Inoue S; Kotani J Kobe J Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 69(4):E151-E158. PubMed ID: 38462525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of 20 laryngoscope blades using an intubating manikin: visual analogue scores and forces exerted during laryngoscopy. Rassam S; Wilkes AR; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh JS Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 15766342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]