These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Authors, industry, and review articles. DeMaria AN J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(6):1130-1. PubMed ID: 15028380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud. Carrió I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Where did the scientific method go? Noseda M; McLean GR Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18183010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Response to Where did the scientific method go? Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29. PubMed ID: 18183012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research. Bhandari S Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "It's déjà vu all over again". Greenebaum B Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):529-30. PubMed ID: 14603471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review and the rewards of open access. Newmark P Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6933):661. PubMed ID: 12700733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the impact factor. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review could be improved by market forces. Jaffe K Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base. Jette AM Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]