These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7722968)

  • 1. Endometrial biopsy dating. Interobserver variation and its impact on clinical practice.
    Smith S; Hosid S; Scott L
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7722968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the time of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge. Does it facilitate the interpretation of endometrial biopsy results?
    Smith S
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Sep; 37(9):785-8. PubMed ID: 1453398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy and interobserver reproducibility of endometrial dating.
    Duggan MA; Brashert P; Ostor A; Scurry J; Billson V; Kneafsey P; Difrancesco L
    Pathology; 2001 Aug; 33(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 11523927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women.
    Myers ER; Silva S; Barnhart K; Groben PA; Richardson MS; Robboy SJ; Leppert P; Coutifaris C;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Nov; 82(5):1278-82. PubMed ID: 15533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects.
    Scott RT; Snyder RR; Strickland DM; Tyburski CC; Bagnall JA; Reed KR; Adair CA; Hensley SB
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Dec; 50(6):888-92. PubMed ID: 3203751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects.
    Scott RT; Snyder RR; Bagnall JW; Reed KD; Adair CF; Hensley SD
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):652-7. PubMed ID: 8405519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women.
    Murray MJ; Meyer WR; Zaino RJ; Lessey BA; Novotny DB; Ireland K; Zeng D; Fritz MA
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1333-43. PubMed ID: 15136099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of luteal function.
    Nakajima ST; Molloy MH; Oi RH; Ohlson KA; Azevedo RA; Boyers SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 8041533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnosis of basal body temperature, serum progesterone and endometrial biopsy for luteal phase defect].
    He H
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Feb; 28(2):82-4, 122-3. PubMed ID: 8344087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Steroid receptor expression in late follicular phase endometrium in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles is already altered, indicating initiation of early luteal phase transformation in the absence of secretory changes.
    Papanikolaou EG; Bourgain C; Kolibianakis E; Tournaye H; Devroey P
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jun; 20(6):1541-7. PubMed ID: 15705618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outpatient endometrial biopsy: clinical, endocrinologic and histologic consequences.
    Li TC; Cooke ID
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1990 Jan; 31(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 1968016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing of the endometrial biopsy may be critical for the accurate diagnosis of luteal phase deficiency.
    Castelbaum AJ; Wheeler J; Coutifaris CB; Mastroianni L; Lessey BA
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Mar; 61(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 8137964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absence of secretory endometrium after false-positive home urine luteinizing hormone testing.
    McGovern PG; Myers ER; Silva S; Coutifaris C; Carson SA; Legro RS; Schlaff WD; Carr BR; Steinkampf MP; Giudice LC; Leppert PC; Diamond MP;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Nov; 82(5):1273-7. PubMed ID: 15533341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.
    Downs-Kelly E; Mendelin JE; Bennett AE; Castilla E; Henricks WH; Schoenfield L; Skacel M; Yerian L; Rice TW; Rybicki LA; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2333-40; quiz 2341. PubMed ID: 18671819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endometrial dating correlated with multiple luteal progesterone levels in confirming ovulation and luteal function in infertile Nigerian women.
    Ilesanmi AO
    West Afr J Med; 1995; 14(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8519702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of luteal phase in normal and infertile women.
    John M; Rameshkumar K; Lillian DA
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 40(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9145608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Realities of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice: a case for non-invasive indirect methodologies.
    Metz DC; Furth EE; Faigel DO; Kroser JA; Alavi A; Barrett DM; Montone K
    Yale J Biol Med; 1998; 71(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 10378353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between two methods of chronological dating of human endometrial biopsies during the luteal phase, and their correlation with histologic dating.
    Li TC; Rogers AW; Lenton EA; Dockery P; Cooke I
    Fertil Steril; 1987 Dec; 48(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 3678512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How precise is histologic dating of endometrium using the standard dating criteria?
    Li TC; Dockery P; Rogers AW; Cooke ID
    Fertil Steril; 1989 May; 51(5):759-63. PubMed ID: 2651164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corpus luteal insufficiency.
    Dawood MY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Apr; 6(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 8193250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.