293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7724102)
1. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expanded cytological referral criteria for colposcopy in cervical screening: comparison with human papillomavirus testing.
Paraskevaidis E; Malamou-Mitsi V; Koliopoulos G; Pappa L; Lolis E; Georgiou I; Agnantis NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Aug; 82(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 11531293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation.
Lonky NM; Felix JC; Naidu YM; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 12636951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The detection of papillomavirus by in situ hybridization. Clinico-pathological and virological correlation in patients with squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix].
Torné A; Ordi J; Puig-Tintoré LM; Jou P; Sánchez E; Muntané J; Iglesias X
Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Nov; 109(18):691-5. PubMed ID: 9499144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.
Fait G; Kupferminc MJ; Daniel Y; Geva E; Ron IG; Lessing JB; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11063640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HPV testing for triage of HIV-infected women with papanicolaou smears read as atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance.
Massad LS; Schneider MF; Watts DH; Strickler HD; Melnick S; Palefsky J; Anastos K; Levine AM; Minkoff H
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Mar; 13(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 15072728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus testing in women with mild cytologic atypia.
Bergeron C; Jeannel D; Poveda J; Cassonnet P; Orth G
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):821-7. PubMed ID: 10831974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
