These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7724106)

  • 1. The correlation between transperineal sonography and digital examination in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix.
    Richey SD; Ramin KD; Roberts SW; Ramin SM; Cox SM; Twickler DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):745-8. PubMed ID: 7724106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Translabial sonography of the lower uterine segment].
    Kokinidis I; Dimitrov A; Karag'ozov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 10734672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination.
    Mahony BS; Nyberg DA; Luthy DA; Hirsch JH; Hickok DE; Petty CN
    J Ultrasound Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):717-23. PubMed ID: 2277401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal sonography in second trimester to term pregnancy and early labor.
    Zilianti M; Azuaga A; Calderon F; Redondo C
    J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):481-5. PubMed ID: 1920587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability.
    Yuce T; Kalafat E; Koc A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):760-765. PubMed ID: 25846302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.
    Eggebø TM; Gjessing LK; Heien C; Smedvig E; Økland I; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 16565994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor.
    Benediktsdottir S; Eggebø TM; Salvesen KÅ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():273. PubMed ID: 26496894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.
    Usman S; Wilkinson M; Barton H; Lees CC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3442-3451. PubMed ID: 29712501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the upper uterine cervix by the location of the vesicocervical fold of the urinary bladder to rule out cervical shortening during pregnancy with and without premature contractions.
    Shalev J; Meizner I; Orvieto R; Mashiach R; Vardimon D; Hod M; Ben-Rafael Z
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 13(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 10423803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor.
    Wiafe YA; Whitehead B; Venables H; Dassah ET; Eggebø TM
    J Ultrasound; 2018 Sep; 21(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 30056591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonography of the cervix during the third trimester of pregnancy: value of the transperineal approach.
    Hertzberg BS; Bowie JD; Weber TM; Carroll BA; Kliewer MA; Jordan SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 2048542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?
    Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapartum ultrasound for assessment of cervical dilatation.
    Hassan WA; Taylor S; Lees C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6S):100448. PubMed ID: 34389531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical dilation: accuracy of visual and digital examinations.
    Brown CL; Ludwiczak MH; Blanco JD; Hirsch CE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 8423953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between visual examination of the cervix and digital examination.
    Pereira L; Gould R; Pelham J; Goldberg J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Mar; 17(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16147828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
    Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal study investigating cervical changes during labor using a wireless ultrasound device.
    Kim J; Kim S; Jeon S; Jung S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(13):1787-1791. PubMed ID: 28627262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
    Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.