BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7724221)

  • 1. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7724221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of induced fixation disparity on binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Pickwell LD; Abd-Manan F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 1454366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of fixation disparity on distance binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S; Murgatroyd RN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Apr; 14(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 8022594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.
    Rubin GS; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3327-34. PubMed ID: 11006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional visual outcomes of cataract extraction in monocular versus binocular patients.
    Pomberg ML; Miller KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15234291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity.
    Heravian JS; Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jul; 10(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of selected variables on monocular, interocular, and binocular visual acuity.
    Pointer JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18296931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V; Jaschinski W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies on development of visual acuity in infants measured by the Teller Acuity Cards.
    Suzuki Y; Awaya S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1995; 39(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 8538073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
    Gall R; Wick B
    Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fresnel prisms and their effects on visual acuity and binocularity.
    Véronneau-Troutman S
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1978; 76():610-53. PubMed ID: 754384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 17126872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distance and near readings of associated heterophoria taken on 500 patients.
    Pickwell LD; Kaye NA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Oct; 11(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 1771065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Near Mallett Unit Foveal Suppression Test: a cross-sectional study to establish test norms and relationship with other optometric tests.
    Tang ST; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 17239188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heterophoria and fixation disparity: a review.
    Kommerell G; Gerling J; Ball M; de Paz H; Bach M
    Strabismus; 2000 Jun; 8(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10980694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monocular Versus Binocular Calibrations in Evaluating Fixation Disparity With a Video-Based Eye-Tracker.
    Švede A; Treija E; Jaschinski W; Krūmiņa G
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1110-28. PubMed ID: 26562925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.