These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7724222)
61. Computerized perimeters. Taylor KP; McManus P; Miller D Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Oct; 16(10):915-7. PubMed ID: 6508085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. [On the behavior of the stereoscopic sense in anisometropic subjects before and after correction with lenses]. Modugno GC; Proto F Boll Ocul; 1966 Jun; 45(6):394-402. PubMed ID: 5963144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters--1986. Keltner JL; Johnson CA Ophthalmology; 1986 Sep; 93(9 Suppl):1-25. PubMed ID: 3808636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. [Experimental clinical study of the possibility of correcting ametropia by refractive thermokeratoplasty]. Avetisov SE; Chetverukhin AP; Nikol'skaia GM Vestn Oftalmol; 1986; 102(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 3765252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. [Modification in the design of th Karl Zeiss (GDR) spheroperimeter]. Marinchev VN Vestn Oftalmol; 1981; (4):66-7. PubMed ID: 7281454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. [Magnet type campimeter]. Matsuo H; Endo N Ganka; 1966 Mar; 8(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 6006874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. An improved negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. Kozlowski JM; Jalkh AE Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Mar; 103(3):326. PubMed ID: 3977703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Demonstration of our new projection ball perimeter with theoretical and clinical remark about perimetry]. GOLDMANN H Ophthalmologica; 1946; 111(2-3):187-92. PubMed ID: 20275801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The Trial-Frame for Test-Lenses, with Demonstration of a New Model. Pyle WL Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1918; 16():171-3. PubMed ID: 16692434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Quantitative Perimetry; Practical Devices and Errors. Walker CB Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1917; 15():166-93. PubMed ID: 16692411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Correction: Online circular contrast perimetry via a web-application: optimising parameters and establishing a normative database. Skalicky SE; Bigirimana D; Busija L Eye (Lond); 2023 Apr; 37(6):1291. PubMed ID: 36725917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The desirability of a Periscopic quality in correcting lenses. Culver CM Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1897; 8():119-20. PubMed ID: 25259242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Performance of the 24-2-5 frequency doubling technology screening test: a prospective case study. Spry PG; Hussin HM; Sparrow JM Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1345-9. PubMed ID: 17389743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Spry PG; Hussin HM; Sparrow JM Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 89(8):1031-5. PubMed ID: 16024860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]