These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location. Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation. Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acute defibrillation performance of a novel, non-transvenous shock pathway in adult ICD indicated patients. Lieberman R; Havel WJ; Rashba E; DeGroot PJ; Stromberg K; Shorofsky SR Heart Rhythm; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18053770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode. Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of titanium-mesh and porous disc electrodes for epicardial defibrillation. Rubin L; Rosenberg D; Parsonnet V; Villaneuva A; Ferrara-Ryan M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1860-4. PubMed ID: 1721189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of the superior vena cava electrode surface area on defibrillation threshold in different lead systems. Tomassoni G; Newby K; Moredock L; Rembert J; Natale A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9474653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system. Newby KH; Moredock L; Rembert J; Wharton JM; Natale A Am Heart J; 1996 Feb; 131(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 8579018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans. Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system. Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold. Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Khalighi K; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Ziemer G; Seipel L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2596-605. PubMed ID: 9894650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]