187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7724846)
1. A commentary on the NRC report "Science and judgment in risk assessment".
McClellan RO
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 2):S142-68. PubMed ID: 7724846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.
McClellan RO
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):149-79. PubMed ID: 8744594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment.
Abt E; Rodricks JV; Levy JI; Zeise L; Burke TA
Risk Anal; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1028-36. PubMed ID: 20497395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical considerations in evaluating scientific evidence of health effects of ambient ozone: a conference report.
McClellan RO; Frampton MW; Koutrakis P; McDonnell WF; Moolgavkar S; North DW; Smith AE; Smith RL; Utell MJ
Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():1-36. PubMed ID: 19731972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk assessment and risk management of noncriteria pollutants.
Lee SD
Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):245-55. PubMed ID: 1670281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment: the default conservatism controversy.
Barnard RC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Jun; 21(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 7480897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key scientific findings and policy- and health-relevant insights from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: an integration and synthesis of results.
Solomon PA; Hopke PK; Froines J; Scheffe R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008; 58(13 Suppl):S3-92. PubMed ID: 19202993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Mar; 59(5-6):281-526. PubMed ID: 10742829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approaches to cancer assessment in EPA's Integrated Risk Information System.
Gehlhaus MW; Gift JS; Hogan KA; Kopylev L; Schlosser PM; Kadry AR
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 21034767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Framework for metals risk assessment.
Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Workshop report: identifying key issues underpinning the selection of linear or non-linear dose-response extrapolation for human health risk assessment of systemic toxicants.
Pottenger LH; Becker RA; Moran EJ; Swenberg JA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 21256913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Default assumptions in carcinogen risk assessment used by regulatory agencies.
Moolenaar RJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 2):S135-41. PubMed ID: 7724845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure information in environmental health research: current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants.
McKone TE; Ryan PB; Ozkaynak H
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 18385670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of non-default uncertainty factors in the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Part I: UF(L), UF(S), and "other uncertainty factors".
Stedeford T; Zhao QJ; Dourson ML; Banasik M; Hsu CH
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2007; 25(3):245-79. PubMed ID: 17763048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A lifestage-specific approach to hazard and dose-response characterization for children's health risk assessment.
Makris SL; Thompson CM; Euling SY; Selevan SG; Sonawane B
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 83(6):530-46. PubMed ID: 19085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk characterization: A bridge to informed decision making.
North DW
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Oct; 39(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 9344620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of the Precautionary Principle: is it a threat to science?
Goldstein BD; Carruth RS
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 15212219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Options for incorporating children's inhaled dose into human health risk assessment.
Ginsberg G; Foos B; Dzubow RB; Firestone M
Inhal Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 22(8):627-47. PubMed ID: 20540622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
