These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7725645)

  • 1. [Review of in vivo technics in the quantification of insulin sensitivity].
    Mokán M
    Vnitr Lek; 1995 Feb; 41(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 7725645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro reversal of hyperglycemia normalizes insulin action in fat cells from type 2 diabetes patients: is cellular insulin resistance caused by glucotoxicity in vivo?
    Burén J; Lindmark S; Renström F; Eriksson JW
    Metabolism; 2003 Feb; 52(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 12601640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of insulin action in normal, obese and NIDDM man: comparison of insulin and glucose infusion test, CIGMA, minimal model and glucose clamp techniques.
    Davis SN; Monti L; Piatti PM; Moller N; Ng L; Coppack S; May M; Brown MD; Orskov H; Alberti KG
    Diabetes Res; 1993; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 7924144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New insulin sensitivity index from the oral glucose tolerance test.
    Kazama Y; Takamura T; Sakurai M; Shindo H; Ohkubo E; Aida K; Harii N; Taki K; Kaneshige M; Tanaka S; Shimura H; Endo T; Kobayashi T
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2008 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 17942180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of minimal models to measuring insulin sensitivity.
    Ng LL; Coppack SW; Zhang L; Hockaday TD
    Horm Metab Res Suppl; 1990; 24():57-9. PubMed ID: 2272627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oxidative stress--mediated alterations in glucose dynamics in a genetic animal model of type II diabetes.
    Bitar MS; Al-Saleh E; Al-Mulla F
    Life Sci; 2005 Sep; 77(20):2552-73. PubMed ID: 15936776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women covering a range of glucose tolerance: comparison of indices derived from the oral glucose tolerance test with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp.
    Piché ME; Lemieux S; Corneau L; Nadeau A; Bergeron J; Weisnagel SJ
    Metabolism; 2007 Sep; 56(9):1159-66. PubMed ID: 17697856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beta-cell function and mass in type 2 diabetes.
    Larsen MO
    Dan Med Bull; 2009 Aug; 56(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 19728971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tests for evaluating insulin sensitivity in vivo].
    Majkowska L
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 10554572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole-body glycolysis measured by the deuterated-glucose disposal test correlates highly with insulin resistance in vivo.
    Beysen C; Murphy EJ; McLaughlin T; Riiff T; Lamendola C; Turner HC; Awada M; Turner SM; Reaven G; Hellerstein MK
    Diabetes Care; 2007 May; 30(5):1143-9. PubMed ID: 17259480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct measure of insulin sensitivity with the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity with the oral glucose tolerance test: correlations with aberrant crypt foci promotion in rats.
    Tran TT; Gupta N; Goh T; Naigamwalla D; Chia MC; Koohestani N; Mehrotra S; McKeown-Eyssen G; Giacca A; Bruce WR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jan; 12(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 12540503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of simple indices of insulin sensitivity using the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique.
    Straczkowski M; Stepień A; Kowalska I; Kinalska I
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Aug; 10(8):CR480-4. PubMed ID: 15277999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How to measure insulin sensitivity in clinical practice?].
    Rabasa-Lhoret R; Laville M
    Diabetes Metab; 2001 Apr; 27(2 Pt 2):201-8. PubMed ID: 11452211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of simple indexes to assess insulin sensitivity during pregnancy in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Cacho J; Sevillano J; de Castro J; Herrera E; Ramos MP
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2008 Nov; 295(5):E1269-76. PubMed ID: 18796548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonobese, insulin-deficient Ins2Akita mice develop type 2 diabetes phenotypes including insulin resistance and cardiac remodeling.
    Hong EG; Jung DY; Ko HJ; Zhang Z; Ma Z; Jun JY; Kim JH; Sumner AD; Vary TC; Gardner TW; Bronson SK; Kim JK
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2007 Dec; 293(6):E1687-96. PubMed ID: 17911348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elevated serum GGT concentrations predict reduced insulin sensitivity and increased intrahepatic lipids.
    Thamer C; Tschritter O; Haap M; Shirkavand F; Machann J; Fritsche A; Schick F; Häring H; Stumvoll M
    Horm Metab Res; 2005 Apr; 37(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 15952086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of insulin sensitivity assessment indices with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp data after a dietary and exercise intervention in older adults.
    Hays NP; Starling RD; Sullivan DH; Fluckey JD; Coker RH; Evans WJ
    Metabolism; 2006 Apr; 55(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 16546484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling glucose metabolism in man: theory and practice.
    Cobelli C; Bier DM; Ferrannini E
    Horm Metab Res Suppl; 1990; 24():1-10. PubMed ID: 2272612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New concepts in extracellular signaling for insulin action: the single gateway hypothesis.
    Bergman RN
    Recent Prog Horm Res; 1997; 52():359-85; discussion 385-7. PubMed ID: 9238859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methods for the measurement of insulin resistance. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp].
    Robert JJ
    Presse Med; 1995 Apr 15-22; 24(15):730-4. PubMed ID: 7784407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.