These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7726074)
1. MR evaluation of vertebral metastases: T1-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery, fast spin-echo, and inversion-recovery fast spin-echo sequences. Mehta RC; Marks MP; Hinks RS; Glover GH; Enzmann DR AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Feb; 16(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 7726074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Fast spin echo imaging of vertebral metastasis: comparison of fat suppression techniques (FSE-CHESS, STIR-FSE)]. Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Scarale MG; Cammisa M; Salvolini U Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 8975299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast spin-echo MR in the detection of vertebral metastases: comparison of three sequences. Jones KM; Schwartz RB; Mantello MT; Ahn SS; Khorasani R; Mukherji S; Oshio K; Mulkern RV AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Mar; 15(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8197934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inversion-recovery fast spin-echo MR imaging: efficacy in the evaluation of head and neck lesions. Panush D; Fulbright R; Sze G; Smith RC; Constable RT Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8475284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla. Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging. Nakatsu M; Hatabu H; Itoh H; Morikawa K; Miki Y; Kasagi K; Shimono T; Shoji K; Shimada Y; Imamura M; Konishi J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jan; 11(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 10676621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Sagittal FSE T2, STIR, and T1-Weighted Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery in the Detection of Spinal Cord Lesions in MS at 3T. Alcaide-Leon P; Pauranik A; Alshafai L; Rawal S; Oh J; Montanera W; Leung G; Bharatha A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 May; 37(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 26797141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted FLAIR and fast spin-echo MRI of the spine at 3 T for evaluation of extradural lesions. Shah KB; Guha-Thakurta N; Schellingerhout D; Madewell JE; Kumar AJ; Costelloe CM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 21862814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of inversion recovery fast spin-echo (FSE) with T2-weighted fat-saturated FSE and T1-weighted MR imaging in bone marrow lesion detection. Pui MH; Chang SK Skeletal Radiol; 1996 Feb; 25(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 8848745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery. Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Paulson EK; Paine SS; Harris L; Dahlke JL; MacFall JR Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 8832865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of MR pulse sequences. Hittmair K; Mallek R; Prayer D; Schindler EG; Kollegger H AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Sep; 17(8):1555-65. PubMed ID: 8883656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast spin-echo inversion-recovery imaging versus fast T2-weighted spin-echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Hilfiker P; Zanetti M; Debatin JF; McKinnon G; Hodler J Invest Radiol; 1995 Feb; 30(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 7654279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective assessment of breath-hold fast spin echo and inversion recovery fast spin echo techniques for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Pawluk RS; Borrello JA; Brown JJ; McFarland EG; Mirowitz SA; Tsao LY Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jun; 18(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 10913716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Focal Cervical Spinal Cord Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of White Matter-Suppressed T1 Inversion Recovery Sequence versus Conventional STIR and Proton Density-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequences. Sundarakumar DK; Smith CM; Hwang WD; Mossa-Basha M; Maravilla KR AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1561-6. PubMed ID: 27056424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. Arndt WF; Truax AL; Barnett FM; Simmons GE; Brown DC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8571859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of sagittal short T1 inversion recovery and T2-weighted FSE sequences for detection of multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Nayak NB; Salah R; Huang JC; Hathout GM Acta Neurol Scand; 2014 Mar; 129(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23980614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of spinal neoplasms: preliminary investigation and comparison with unenhanced spin-echo and STIR sequences. Stimac GK; Porter BA; Olson DO; Gerlach R; Genton M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Dec; 151(6):1185-92. PubMed ID: 3055895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]