1004 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7726464)
1. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of frictional resistance during simulated canine retraction on typodont model.
Sukh R; Singh GK; Tandon P; Singh GP; Singh A
J Orthod Sci; 2013 Apr; 2(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24987644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
Thorstenson G; Kusy R
Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
