These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1010 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7726464)

  • 1. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
    Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of frictional resistance during simulated canine retraction on typodont model.
    Sukh R; Singh GK; Tandon P; Singh GP; Singh A
    J Orthod Sci; 2013 Apr; 2(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24987644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson G; Kusy R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.