These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1010 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7726464)

  • 41. Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces.
    Ireland AJ; Sherriff M; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 1915622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe J; Gordon P
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 7857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.
    Hain M; Dhopatkar A; Rock P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.
    Ozturk Ortan Y; Yurdakuloglu Arslan T; Aydemir B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 21239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets.
    Muguruma T; Iijima M; Brantley WA; Ahluwalia KS; Kohda N; Mizoguchi I
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1054-61. PubMed ID: 24738791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
    Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
    Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.
    Articolo LC; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 9878956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets.
    Bazakidou E; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Sinha P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9267224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
    Taylor NG; Ison K
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.
    Jones SP; Amoah KG
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17679533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.
    Choi SH; Kang DY; Hwang CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 23767940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sliding resistance with esthetic ligatures: an in-vitro study.
    Bortoly TG; Guerrero AP; Rached RN; Tanaka O; Guariza-Filho O; Rosa EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):340.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18331929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Change in crown inclination accompanying initial tooth alignment with round archwires.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(3):e2220489. PubMed ID: 35792791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.