BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7727811)

  • 21. Echography of inferior vena cava for estimating fluid removed from patients undergoing hemodialysis.
    Kusaba T; Yamaguchi K; Oda H; Harada T
    Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi; 1994 Aug; 36(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 7933667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in cardiac output with hemodialysis relate to net volume balance and to inferior vena cava ultrasound collapsibility in critically ill patients.
    Kaptein MJ; Kaptein JS; Nguyen CD; Oo Z; Thwe PP; Thu MB; Kaptein EM
    Ren Fail; 2020 Nov; 42(1):179-192. PubMed ID: 32050836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fluid state and blood pressure control in patients treated with long and short haemodialysis.
    Katzarski KS; Charra B; Luik AJ; Nisell J; Divino Filho JC; Leypoldt JK; Leunissen KM; Laurent G; Bergström J
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Feb; 14(2):369-75. PubMed ID: 10069191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evaluation of filtration coefficients of microvasculature for the assessment of fluid 
status in hemodialysis patients.
    Yashiro M; Ochiai M; Fujisawa N; Kadoya Y; Kamata T
    Int J Artif Organs; 2013 Jan; 36(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 23280078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in Sonographically Measured Inferior Vena Caval Diameter in Response to Fluid Loading in Term Pregnancy.
    Hernandez CA; Reed KL; Juneman EB; Cohen WR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Feb; 35(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 26782160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between filtration coefficients of microvasculature and levels of atrial natriuretic peptide or echocardiographic measurements.
    Yashiro M; Watanabe H; Tomita M; Yamadori N; Muso E
    Blood Purif; 2005; 23(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 16155375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of extracellular fluid volume and fluid status in hemodialysis patients: current status and technical advances.
    Dou Y; Zhu F; Kotanko P
    Semin Dial; 2012 Jul; 25(4):377-87. PubMed ID: 22686593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How does higher ultrafiltration within the conventional clinical range impact the volume status of hemodialysis patients?
    Yashiro M; Kamata T; Segawa H; Murakami T; Kadoya Y; Muso E
    Blood Purif; 2009; 27(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 19218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lung density for assessment of hydration status in hemodialysis patients using the computed tomographic densitometry technique.
    Metry G; Wegenius G; Wikström B; Källskog V; Hansell P; Lindgren PG; Hedenström H; Danielson BG
    Kidney Int; 1997 Dec; 52(6):1635-44. PubMed ID: 9407511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Value of inferior vena cava diameter and inferior vena cava collapse index in the evaluation of peripartum volume: A prospective cohort study.
    Chong Y; Yu Y; Zhao Y; Zhang Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 285():69-73. PubMed ID: 37062116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The inferior vena cava diameter is a useful ultrasound finding for predicting postpartum blood loss.
    Oba T; Koyano M; Hasegawa J; Takita H; Arakaki T; Nakamura M; Sekizawa A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29621917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inferior vena cava diameter and left atrial diameter measure volume but not dry weight.
    Agarwal R; Bouldin JM; Light RP; Garg A
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2011 May; 6(5):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21330484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between clinical judgment and integrated lung and inferior vena cava ultrasonography for dry weight estimation in hemodialysis patients.
    Arun Thomas ET; Mohandas MK; George J
    Hemodial Int; 2019 Oct; 23(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 31107594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Measurement of the inferior vena cava diameter for estimating fluid status in hemodialysis patients].
    Ning JP; Xiao Y; Tao LJ; Cao ZH
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2000 Jun; 25(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 12212173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of inferior vena cava and right ventricular diameter in assessment of volume status: a comparative study: ultrasound and hypovolemia.
    Zengin S; Al B; Genc S; Yildirim C; Ercan S; Dogan M; Altunbas G
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 23602752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of anterior-posterior diameter of inferior vena cava by ultrasonography: a new non-invasive method to assess acute changes in vascular filling state.
    Duvekot JJ; Cheriex EC; Tan WD; Heidendal GA; Peeters LL
    Cardiovasc Res; 1994 Aug; 28(8):1269-72. PubMed ID: 7954632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Which echocardiographic parameter is a better marker of volume status in hemodialysis patients?
    Sabaghian T; Hajibaratali B; Samavat S
    Ren Fail; 2016 Nov; 38(10):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 27764980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Sonographic study of the diameter of the inferior vena cava for optimal ultrafiltration in hemodialysis].
    Remes O; Sulková S
    Vnitr Lek; 2002 Mar; 48(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 11968582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variability of relative blood volume during haemodialysis.
    Krepel HP; Nette RW; Akçahüseyin E; Weimar W; Zietse R
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000 May; 15(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 10809809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Handcarried ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava for assessment of intravascular volume status in the outpatient hemodialysis clinic.
    Brennan JM; Ronan A; Goonewardena S; Blair JE; Hammes M; Shah D; Vasaiwala S; Kirkpatrick JN; Spencer KT
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Jul; 1(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 17699282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.