122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7728163)
21. Aspects of member satisfaction under two types of health delivery systems: a comparison of prepaid group practice HMO members and a Blue Cross/Blue Shield matched control group.
Sorensen AA; Wersinger RP
Group Health J; 1980; 1(2):33-41. PubMed ID: 10247921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. 'Model' rural IDS suffers $49M legal hit in battle with Blues.
Greene JL; Rudd T
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Jan; 12(2):1-2, 5. PubMed ID: 10152386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Judge in Marshfield appeals case, clarifies views on MFNs, markets.
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Nov; 12(24):5-7. PubMed ID: 10154257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Marshfield verdict partly overturned; panel orders retrial.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(39):4-5. PubMed ID: 10151421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 Nov; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Policy makers set sights on regulating risk-bearing groups.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2001 Mar; 8(3):44-7, 33. PubMed ID: 11299644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Health maintenance organizations and the role of antitrust law.
Kissam PC
Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):487-541. PubMed ID: 10239065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Wis. insurer suing physicians in reversal of typical roles.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(13):33. PubMed ID: 10132355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim.
Kazon PM
Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10290529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In nearly complete legal 180, federal appeals court spares rural Wisc. IDS.
Steele CJ
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Sep; 12(20):8-10. PubMed ID: 10184451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The rise and fall of a Kaiser Permanente expansion region.
Gitterman DP; Weiner BJ; Domino ME; McKethan AN; Enthoven AC
Milbank Q; 2003; 81(4):567-601. PubMed ID: 14678480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 26 states seek antitrust ruling.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1996 Feb; 26(8):4. PubMed ID: 10154762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Capitated physicians score victory as two plans settle antitrust suit.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2004 Jan; 11(1):6-8, 1. PubMed ID: 15002203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal. Experts debate the impact of antitrust suit against Michigan Blues.
Taylor M
Hosp Health Netw; 2010 Dec; 84(12):12, 14. PubMed ID: 21268792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Nine New Jersey hospitals charge Blue Cross with antitrust. Beth Israel Hospital et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.
Hudson T
Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Sep; 67(18):62. PubMed ID: 8369840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Antitrust antagonists. West Penn claims UPMC, Highmark conspired.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2009 Apr; 39(17):10. PubMed ID: 19422119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Feds challenge Marshfield ruling.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(41):33. PubMed ID: 10152052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical participation in control of open-panel medical prepayment plans.
Bryan JE
Am Fam Physician; 1979 Dec; 20(6):159-60, 164-5. PubMed ID: 517380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Antitrust action averted. Agreement with Pa. attorney general allows UPMC merger to proceed.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2001 Oct; 31(44):14-5. PubMed ID: 11715731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Examining exclusionary conduct of HMOs and PPOs: a case comment on Northwest Medical Laboratories v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon.
Levitt DM
Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):271-88. PubMed ID: 1785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
