These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7729447)

  • 1. Discrepancies in susceptibility test results for imipenem employing different in vitro test methods and DIN 58,940 breakpoints.
    Grimm H; Hauss C; Rodloff AC
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Jan; 14(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 7729447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility testing of macrolide and lincosamide antibiotics according to DIN guidelines. Deutsches Institut für Normung.
    Schmalreck AF; Kottmann I; Reiser A; Ruffer U; Schlenk R; Vanca E; Wildfeuer A
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Aug; 40(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 9301982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli by Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, and Gradient Strip Methods Compared with Broth Microdilution.
    Hakvoort H; Bovenkamp E; Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Schmidt-Malan SM; Mandrekar JN; Schuetz AN; Patel R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 32727832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative in vitro activity of Meropenem, Imipenem and Piperacillin/tazobactam against 1071 clinical isolates using 2 different methods: a French multicentre study.
    Joly-Guillou ML; Kempf M; Cavallo JD; Chomarat M; Dubreuil L; Maugein J; Muller-Serieys C; Roussel-Delvallez M
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Mar; 10():72. PubMed ID: 20298555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (agar disk diffusion and agar dilution) of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium: comparison of Mueller-Hinton, Iso-Sensitest, and Wilkins-Chalgren agar media.
    Traub WH; Geipel U; Leonhard B
    Chemotherapy; 1998; 44(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 9681198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints against reference broth microdilution.
    Bengtsson S; Bjelkenbrant C; Kahlmeter G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Jun; 20(6):O353-60. PubMed ID: 24118469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Culver DH; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the E-test and reference agar dilution method for susceptibility of gram-negative anaerobic organisms.
    Couroux PR; Massey VE; Schieven BC; Lannigan R; Hussain Z
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Sep; 100(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 8379540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining VITEK
    Lellouche J; Schwartz D; Elmalech N; Ben Dalak MA; Temkin E; Paul M; Geffen Y; Yahav D; Eliakim-Raz N; Durante-Mangoni E; Iossa D; Bernardo M; Daikos GL; Skiada A; Pantazatou A; Antoniadou A; Mouton JW; Carmeli Y;
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Jun; 25(6):711-716. PubMed ID: 30291971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of BSAC agar dilution and NCCLS broth microdilution MIC methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: the BSAC Respiratory Resistance Surveillance Programme.
    Reynolds R; Shackcloth J; Felmingham D; MacGowan A;
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Dec; 52(6):925-30. PubMed ID: 14585864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR; de Smet AM; Diederen BM; Kluytmans JA; van Keulen PH
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections in South African hospitals (SMART Study 2004-2009): impact of the new carbapenem breakpoints.
    Brink AJ; Botha RF; Poswa X; Senekal M; Badal RE; Grolman DC; Richards GA; Feldman C; Boffard KD; Veller M; Joubert I; Pretorius J
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2012 Feb; 13(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22220506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study with ciprofloxacin: interpretive criteria of agar diffusion test according to standards of the NCCLS and DIN.
    Grimm H
    Am J Med; 1987 Apr; 82(4A):376-80. PubMed ID: 3578326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of E-test with other conventional susceptibility testing methods for ciprofloxacin and gentamicin against gram negative enteric bacilli.
    Ogbolu DO; Terry-Alli OA; Daini OA; Olabiyi FA; Igharo EA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2012 Jun; 41(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 23185910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole.
    Perna F; Gatta L; Figura N; Ricci C; Tampieri A; Holton J; Miglioli M; Vaira D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2157-61. PubMed ID: 14572561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro susceptibility test of sitafloxacin against resistant gram-negative bacilli isolated from Thai patients by disk diffusion method.
    Thamlikitkul V; Tiengrim S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Mar; 97 Suppl 3():S7-12. PubMed ID: 24772575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carbapenem susceptibilities and non-susceptibility concordance to different carbapenems amongst clinically important Gram-negative bacteria isolated from intensive care units in Taiwan: results from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2009.
    Jean SS; Hsueh PR; Lee WS; Yu KW; Liao CH; Chang FY; Ko WC; Wu JJ; Chen YH; Chen YS; Liu JW; Lu MC; Liu CY; Lam C; Chen RJ
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2013 May; 41(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 23507415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility patterns of clinical and fish isolates of Laribacter hongkongensis: comparison of the Etest, disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods.
    Lau SK; Wong GK; Poon RW; Lee LC; Leung KW; Tse CW; Ho PL; Que TL; Woo PC; Yuen KY
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Apr; 63(4):704-8. PubMed ID: 19202149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of commonly used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for evaluating susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli to cefoperazone-sulbactam.
    Jean SS; Liao CH; Sheng WH; Lee WS; Hsueh PR
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2017 Aug; 50(4):454-463. PubMed ID: 26454423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.