These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7730041)

  • 1. Feminism, social policy, and long-acting contraception.
    Nelson HL; Nelson JL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):S30-2. PubMed ID: 7730041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender.
    Albiston C
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ethical challenge to prochoice advocates: abortion and the pluralistic proposition.
    Callahan D
    Commonweal; 1990 Nov; 117(20):681-7. PubMed ID: 11659386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A shot in the arm for contraception policy: using Norplant to reduce teenage pregnancy in New Zealand.
    Webb M
    Polit Sci; 1994 Dec; 46(2):172-92. PubMed ID: 11653262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive liberty under the threat of care: deputizing private agents and deconstructing state action.
    Kelly L
    Mich J Gend Law; 1998-1999; 5(1):81-111. PubMed ID: 16596758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.
    Young ME
    Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term contraceptives in the criminal justice system.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):S15-8. PubMed ID: 7730037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The constitutionality of court imposed contraception as a condition of probation.
    Mubaraki M
    Crim Justice J; 1992; 14(2):385-405. PubMed ID: 16700114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion ethics: rights and responsibilities.
    Porter E
    Hypatia; 1994; 9(3):66-87. PubMed ID: 11660598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When the pill gets under your skin.
    Seymour J
    New Sci; 1993 Dec; 140(1902):22-4. PubMed ID: 11659697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive freedoms and African American women.
    Rutherford C
    Yale J Law Fem; 1992; 4(2):255-90. PubMed ID: 11656355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant.
    Henley M
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):703-77. PubMed ID: 11659736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
    Callahan J
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
    Mertus J; Heller S
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
    Burke M
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control?
    Spitz SS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
    Ballard T
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.