155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7730479)
1. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C
Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
Pugh SF; Slack RC; Caul EO; Paul ID; Appleton PN; Gatley S
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 3902899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Chomvarin C; Chantarasuk Y; Thongkrajai P; Yutanawiboonchai W; Waropastrakul N
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2000 Mar; 31(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 11023074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enzyme immunoassay and enzyme-linked fluoroimmunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
Leinonen M; Saikku P; Nurminen M; Lassus A
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 3326744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Kluytmans JA; van der Willigen AH; van Heyst BY; van der Meyden WI; Stolz E; Wagenvoort JH
Int J STD AIDS; 1990 Jan; 1(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 2099199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.
Genç M; Stary A; Bergman S; Mårdh PA
APMIS; 1991 May; 99(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 2043357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme).
Adjei O; Lal V
J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of verification assays in EIA specimens presumptively positive for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Leonardi GP; Stavroulakis AM; Cruz J; Szabo K
J Med Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 44(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8642577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.
Svensson LO; Mares I; Olsson SE; Nordström ML
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. PubMed ID: 1785275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in first-void urine to identify asymptomatic male carriers.
Genç M; Dutertre Y; Björk M; Mårdh PA
APMIS; 1992 Jul; 100(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 1642853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
