These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7731363)

  • 1. Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.
    Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 7731363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.
    Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 9610119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cuing effects in short-term recall.
    Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):719-32. PubMed ID: 8961817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.
    Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.
    Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 21264624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
    Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 10764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech, "inner speech," and the development of short-term memory: effects of picture labeling on recall.
    Hitch GJ; Halliday MS; Schaafstal AM; Heffernan TM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Apr; 51(2):220-34. PubMed ID: 2033361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.
    Bunting M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 16569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.
    Szpunar KK; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1392-9. PubMed ID: 18980403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory list memory and interference processes in monkeys.
    Wright AA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):284-96. PubMed ID: 10423854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall.
    Lange EB; Oberauer K
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):333-9. PubMed ID: 15948618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proactive inhibition and semantic organization: relationship with verbal memory in patients with schizophrenia.
    Kareken DA; Moberg PJ; Gur RC
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1996 Nov; 2(6):486-93. PubMed ID: 9375152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning.
    Diaz M; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21264631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task.
    Postle BR; Berger JS; Goldstein JH; Curtis CE; D'Esposito M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Mar; 1(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12467100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reversing the phonological similarity effect.
    Nairne JS; Kelley MR
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 10087855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.