These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7731364)

  • 1. Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.
    Jones DM; Macken WJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 7731364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
    Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.
    Jones D; Madden C; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 May; 44(4):645-69. PubMed ID: 1615168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
    Odgers RP; Colle HA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing state hypothesis.
    Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):143-60. PubMed ID: 8177959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.
    Jones D; Morris N
    Scand J Psychol; 1992 Sep; 33(3):212-29. PubMed ID: 1488646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dichotic listening: what does it measure?
    Jäncke L; Steinmetz H; Volkmann J
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Nov; 30(11):941-50. PubMed ID: 1470338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1154-65. PubMed ID: 8805820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Murray AC
    Mem Cognit; 1993 May; 21(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 8316094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Neely CB; Wilson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):472-83. PubMed ID: 9080015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual degradation due to signal alteration: implications for auditory pattern processing.
    Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 1830083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of syllable timing by prebabbling infants.
    Fowler CA; Smith MR; Tassinary LG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):814-25. PubMed ID: 3958324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.
    Viswanathan N; Dorsi J; George S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 23883307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.