244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7731649)
1. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
Simpson TL; Regan D
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.
Regan D; Hong XH
Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
Rabin J; Wicks J
Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia.
Giaschi DE; Regan D; Kraft SP; Hong XH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Jul; 33(8):2483-9. PubMed ID: 1634346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
Haymes SA; Chen J
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
Pluháček F; Siderov J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.
Thakur S; Ichhpujani P; Kumar S; Kaur R; Sood S
Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 29755121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds.
Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ
Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.
Faria BM; Duman F; Zheng CX; Waisbourd M; Gupta L; Ali M; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Richman J; Spaeth GL
Retina; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25658175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interocular differences in visual function in normal subjects.
Wood JM; Bullimore MA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 8944198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
Rabin J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
