These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7732800)

  • 1. Background factors and scoring systems in relation to pregnancy outcome after fertility surgery.
    Strandell A; Bryman I; Janson PO; Thorburn J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Apr; 74(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 7732800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Second-look laparoscopy after ectopic pregnancy.
    Lundorff P; Thorburn J; Lindblom B
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Apr; 53(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 2138569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Previous ectopic pregnancy should be considered a contraindication for microsurgery.
    Strandell A; Thorburn J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Apr; 75(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8638463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty in nonocclusive distal tubal disease.
    Saleh WA; Dlugi AM
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Mar; 67(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 9091333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion formation after tubal surgery: results of the eighth-day laparoscopy in 188 patients.
    Trimbos-Kemper TC; Trimbos JB; van Hall EV
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Mar; 43(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 3156771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery.
    Johnson NP; Watson A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001897. PubMed ID: 10796835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting fertility following radical versus conservative surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy.
    Rashid M; Osman SH; Khashoggi TY; Kamal FA
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 11331492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The prognostic value of pre- and postoperative adhesion scores (AS) and chromopertubation scores (CPS) in tubal interventions for sterility. 2. Postoperative rate of conception in relation to pre- and postoperative laparoscopy findings in tubal interventions for sterility].
    Römer T; Lober R; Göretzlehner G; Nikschick S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 1831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.
    Laatikainen TJ; Tenhunen AK; Venesmaa PK; Apter DL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1988; 243(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 3401038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tubal conservation with ectopic gestations. A reappraisal.
    Starks G
    Am Surg; 1984 Apr; 50(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 6231872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of microsurgical treatment of tubal infertility and early second-look laparoscopy in the post-pelvic inflammatory disease patient: implications for in vitro fertilization.
    Luber K; Beeson CC; Kennedy JF; Villanueva B; Young PE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 154(6):1264-70. PubMed ID: 2940868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.
    de Bennetot M; Rabischong B; Aublet-Cuvelier B; Belard F; Fernandez H; Bouyer J; Canis M; Pouly JL
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1271-6.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22818285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal reconstructive microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology procedures.
    Schippert C; Soergel P; Staboulidou I; Bassler C; Gagalick S; Hillemanns P; Buehler K; Garcia-Rocha GJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21947340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases.
    Singhal V; Li TC; Cooke ID
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 1883785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochrane review: post-operative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery.
    Johnson NP; Watson A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2000; 6(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 10874571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new tubal classification system for fertility prognosis after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
    Ding Y; Huang W; Jiang H; Zhu J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():136-41. PubMed ID: 27285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for subfertility.
    Chew S; Chan C; Ng SC; Ratnam SS
    Singapore Med J; 1998 Nov; 39(11):491-5. PubMed ID: 10067385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis.
    Ahmad G; Watson AJ; Metwally M
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Mar; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 17454208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
    Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of second-look laparoscopy on subsequent fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy: a randomized controlled study.
    Li Z; Liu J; Min W; Zhang D; Yang X; Sun Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 25620217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.