169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7733076)
1. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Boberg KM; Jebsen P; Clausen OP; Foss A; Aabakken L; Schrumpf E
J Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 45(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 16879890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Kummet TD
Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 May; 86(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 2028947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Lindberg B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A; Thörne A; Hjerpe A; Granqvist S; Hansson LO; Tribukait B; Persson B; Broomé U
Endoscopy; 2002 Nov; 34(11):909-16. PubMed ID: 12430077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endobiliary brush biopsy: Intra- and interobserver variation in cytological evaluation of brushings from bile duct strictures.
Adamsen S; Olsen M; Jendresen MB; Holck S; Glenthøj A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 41(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 16638704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation.
Harewood GC; Baron TH; Stadheim LM; Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Salomao DR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1464-9. PubMed ID: 15307861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical value of K-ras codon 12 analysis and endobiliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignant extrahepatic bile duct stenosis.
Sturm PD; Rauws EA; Hruban RH; Caspers E; Ramsoekh TB; Huibregtse K; Noorduyn LA; Offerhaus GJ
Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Mar; 5(3):629-35. PubMed ID: 10100716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brush cytology is superior to biopsies obtained by a new device in bile duct strictures.
Ung KA; Ljung A; Wågermark J; Lindholm J; Rydberg L; Kilander A; Stotzer PO; Burian P
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):664-8. PubMed ID: 17591037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.
Layfield LJ; Wax TD; Lee JG; Cotton PB
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7846997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of bile cytology in the diagnostic management of patients with biliary tract obstruction.
Cobb CJ; Floyd WN
Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 2984868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Tischendorf JJ; Krüger M; Trautwein C; Duckstein N; Schneider A; Manns MP; Meier PN
Endoscopy; 2006 Jul; 38(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 16673310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
