These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7734532)

  • 21. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital radiography for clinical applications.
    Busch HP
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S66-72. PubMed ID: 9169104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefits of a new direct digital x-ray imaging system.
    Jeromin LS; Lee DL; Grozalis EJ; Wolff DP
    J Belge Radiol; 1997 Oct; 80(5):254-6. PubMed ID: 9400060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital imaging of the chest.
    Fraser RG; Sanders C; Barnes GT; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Doi K; Templeton AW; Cox GG; Dwyer SJ; Merritt CR
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 2649913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Digital radiography. Cost-benefit analysis].
    Braunschweig R; Pistitsch C; Nissen-Meyer S
    Radiologe; 1996 Apr; 36(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 8677323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
    Parkin GJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Digital radiography of the chest in pediatric patients].
    Puig S
    Radiologe; 2003 Dec; 43(12):1045-50. PubMed ID: 14668992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of digital radiography on emergency department radiographic examinations.
    Lee B; Junewick J; Luttenton C
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16601999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital chest radiology.
    Hansell DM
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Jun; 3(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 1859770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.