These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7734548)
1. Clinical usefulness of digital radiography in the gastrointestinal tract: efficacy of magnification method. Sugino Y; Imai Y; Fujisawa H; Hiramatsu K; Amoh H; Kumakura K J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):84-8. PubMed ID: 7734548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gastrointestinal examinations with a 2,048- x 2,048-pixel image intensifier television digital radiography system. Baba Y; Takahashi M; Tsuchigami T; Higashida Y J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):80-3. PubMed ID: 7734547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical and clinical evaluation of a 2,048 x 2,048-matrix image intensifier TV digital imaging system in bone radiography. Higashida Y; Baba Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):842-8. PubMed ID: 8923903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system]. Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolution properties of a 2048 x 2048 matrix image intensifier-TV based digital radiography system. Ogura T; Fujita H Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 8208222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy. Rosenstein DS Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared]. Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic reporting directly from the TV monitor of a digital chest radiography system. Kheddache S; Tylén U; Schlossman D Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 1889435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters]. Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy. Srinivas Y; Wilson DL Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device. Iinuma G; Ushio K; Ishikawa T; Nawano S; Sekiguchi R; Satake M Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 10671599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The potentials of digital image-intensifier radiography exemplified by digital spot imaging (DSI)]. Rückforth J; Wein B; Stargardt A; Günther RW Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 7579216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a 2,048 x 2,048-pixel image intensifier-TV digital radiography system. Basic imaging properties and clinical application. Takahashi M; Ueno S; Tsuchigame T; Higashida Y; Hirata Y; Moribe N; Takada T; Kamiya M; Koike K Invest Radiol; 1992 Nov; 27(11):898-907. PubMed ID: 1464507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fracture diagnosis with digital luminescence radiography]. Klein HM; Wein B; Langen HJ; Glaser KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1648759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography of the musculoskeletal system: the optimal image. Freedman M; Steller D J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):37-42. PubMed ID: 7734538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between the electronic magnification (EM) and true magnification (TM) of breast phantom images using a CDMAM phantom. Vahey K; Ryan E; McLean D; Poulos A; Rickard M Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1514-9. PubMed ID: 21481555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography]. Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]