These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7735748)

  • 1. Improved image quality utilizing dual plate computed radiography.
    Workman A; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):182-8. PubMed ID: 7735748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plate-specific gain map correction for the improvement of detective quantum efficiency in computed radiography.
    Schnell EA; Samei E; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1495-504. PubMed ID: 22380382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate.
    Nakano Y; Gido T; Honda S; Maezawa A; Wakamatsu H; Yanagita T
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):592-7. PubMed ID: 11991131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical "front side" and novel "dual side" readout storage phosphors.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 16532933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: improved detection and processing.
    Ergun DL; Mistretta CA; Brown DE; Bystrianyk RT; Sze WK; Kelcz F; Naidich DP
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):243-9. PubMed ID: 2294555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3637-9. PubMed ID: 17089829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of AMBER in single- and dual-energy digital imaging: improvement in noise level and display dynamic range.
    de Rooij TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman HA; Prokop M; Schaefer CM
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 8190963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
    Marshall NW; Smet M; Hofmans M; Pauwels H; De Clercq T; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen computed radiography.
    Shaw CC; Wang TP; Breitenstein DS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 9284253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of the performance of digital mammographic X-ray equipment: determination of noise equivalent quanta (NEQQC) and detective quantum efficiency (DQEQC) compared with the automated analysis of CDMAM test images with CDCOM and CDIC programs.
    Loos C; Buhr H; Blendl C
    Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):635-43. PubMed ID: 23801376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.