These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7735748)

  • 21. Plate scatter correction for improved performance in dual-energy imaging.
    Hinshaw DA; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):871-6. PubMed ID: 8798172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Physical image properties of digital radiography systems in low dose range].
    Kunitomo H; Ichikawa K; Higashide R; Ohashi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):961-9. PubMed ID: 22975694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols.
    Werncke T; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 24918463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
    Joseph PM; Stockham CD
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems.
    Cunningham IA; Westmore MS; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 8208217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.
    Urbanczyk H; McDonagh E; Marshall NW; Castellano I
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 22429938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.
    Cowen AR; Workman A; Price JS
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 66(784):332-45. PubMed ID: 8495288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of x-ray beam hardening on detective quantum efficiency and radiation dose.
    Wong MD; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 25214383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
    Kandarakis I; Cavouras D; Koutsourakis C; Triantis D; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G; Nomicos C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pixelwise fusion for optimizing SNR in multiple-plate computed radiography imaging.
    Wang T; Shaw CC; Li CC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 10363702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A detector for scanned projection radiography.
    Sones RA; Lauro KL; Cattell CL
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 2326481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
    Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography.
    Brettle DS; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Nov; 39(11):1989-2004. PubMed ID: 15560006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.