These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7735750)

  • 21. Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations.
    Hemdal B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21778158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
    Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient dose and risk in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):360-5. PubMed ID: 2025777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of mean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels within the all-digital Irish National Breast Screening Programme and the Irish Symptomatic Breast Services.
    O'Leary D; Rainford L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 22740646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monte Carlo simulation for correlation analysis of average glandular dose by breast thickness and glandular ratio in breast tissue.
    Kim ST; Cho JK
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 24704647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
    Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosage evaluation in mammography.
    Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):577-84. PubMed ID: 6691119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
    Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit.
    Bor D; Tükel S; Olgar T; Aydin E
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 14(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 18814131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for estimating compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Burch A; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 68(808):394-9. PubMed ID: 7795976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment.
    Bouwman RW; Diaz O; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 58(13):4423-38. PubMed ID: 23756494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The resulting skin dose in two-view mammography examinations.
    Adliene D; Cibulskaite I; Laurikaitiene J; Adlys G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 20200100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study.
    Myronakis ME; Zvelebil M; Darambara DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2247-65. PubMed ID: 23475310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.