These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737398)

  • 1. Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics.
    Jackson SR; Jackson GM; Rosicky J
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 102(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 7737398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.
    Gentilucci M; Toni I; Chieffi S; Pavesi G
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 99(3):483-500. PubMed ID: 7957728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.
    Desmurget M; Prablanc C; Arzi M; Rossetti Y; Paulignan Y; Urquizar C
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jul; 110(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 8836690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coordination and control of bimanual prehension: effects of perturbing object location.
    Mason AH
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 18357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson's disease.
    Adamovich SV; Berkinblit MB; Hening W; Sage J; Poizner H
    Neuroscience; 2001; 104(4):1027-41. PubMed ID: 11457588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position.
    Paulignan Y; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R; Jeannerod M
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 83(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 2026193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.
    Gentilucci M; Castiello U; Corradini ML; Scarpa M; Umiltà C; Rizzolatti G
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(5):361-78. PubMed ID: 1886680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems.
    Loftus A; Murphy S; McKenna I; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 15197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kinematic analysis of prehension movements in children.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Stolze H; Boczek-Funcke A; Jöhnk K; Heinrichs H; Illert M
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 93(1-2):131-41. PubMed ID: 9659995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.
    Bingham G; Coats R; Mon-Williams M
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 17045314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.
    Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes. Differential interference effects.
    Castiello U
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Dec; 123(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 9860267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks.
    Tresilian JR; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jun; 115(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 9224856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect.
    Chieffi S; Gentilucci M; Allport A; Sasso E; Rizzolatti G
    Brain; 1993 Oct; 116 ( Pt 5)():1119-37. PubMed ID: 8221051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.
    Servos P; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 98(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 8013579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements.
    Kritikos A; Beresford M
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11976754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.
    Magdalon EC; Michaelsen SM; Quevedo AA; Levin MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 21684505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.
    Jakobson LS; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 86(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 1756790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.