115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737428)
1. Evaluation of auricular lymph node cell proliferation in isothiazolone-treated mice.
Potter DW; Hazelton GA
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Feb; 24(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7737428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the relative skin sensitizing potency of 3 biocides using the murine local lymph node assay.
Botham PA; Hilton J; Evans CD; Lees D; Hall TJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Sep; 25(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1782769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge.
Chan PK; Baldwin RC; Parsons RD; Moss JN; Stiratelli R; Smith JM; Hayes AW
J Invest Dermatol; 1983 Nov; 81(5):409-11. PubMed ID: 6631051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses.
De Jong WH; Tentij M; Spiekstra SW; Vandebriel RJ; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2002 Jul; 176(1-2):123-34. PubMed ID: 12062936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison.
Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site.
Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergenicity testing of supermethrin, phenoxyacetic acid and DNCB using in vivo and in vitro modifications of the local lymph node assays, maximization and epicutaneous testing.
Kuricova M; Tulinska J; Kubova J; Liskova A; Fuortes L
J Appl Toxicol; 2001; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 11481656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment.
Gerberick GF; House RV; Fletcher ER; Ryan CA
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 19(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 1459374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig.
Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-reactivity between methylisothiazolinone, octylisothiazolinone and benzisothiazolinone using a modified local lymph node assay.
Schwensen JF; Menné Bonefeld C; Zachariae C; Agerbeck C; Petersen TH; Geisler C; Bollmann UE; Bester K; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 176(1):176-183. PubMed ID: 27343839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
