These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737428)
1. Evaluation of auricular lymph node cell proliferation in isothiazolone-treated mice. Potter DW; Hazelton GA Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Feb; 24(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7737428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Maurer T; Kimber I Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the relative skin sensitizing potency of 3 biocides using the murine local lymph node assay. Botham PA; Hilton J; Evans CD; Lees D; Hall TJ Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Sep; 25(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1782769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens. Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. Chan PK; Baldwin RC; Parsons RD; Moss JN; Stiratelli R; Smith JM; Hayes AW J Invest Dermatol; 1983 Nov; 81(5):409-11. PubMed ID: 6631051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses. De Jong WH; Tentij M; Spiekstra SW; Vandebriel RJ; Van Loveren H Toxicology; 2002 Jul; 176(1-2):123-34. PubMed ID: 12062936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay. Kimber I; Weisenberger C J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison. Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site. Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergenicity testing of supermethrin, phenoxyacetic acid and DNCB using in vivo and in vitro modifications of the local lymph node assays, maximization and epicutaneous testing. Kuricova M; Tulinska J; Kubova J; Liskova A; Fuortes L J Appl Toxicol; 2001; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 11481656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. Gerberick GF; House RV; Fletcher ER; Ryan CA Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 19(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 1459374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig. Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles. Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds. Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]