115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737428)
21. Assessment of glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1 as a correlate of allergen-stimulated lymph node activation.
Betts CJ; Moggs JG; Caddick HT; Cumberbatch M; Orphanides G; Dearman RJ; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Frank Gerberick G; Kimber I
Toxicology; 2003 Mar; 185(1-2):103-17. PubMed ID: 12505449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intracellular expression of cytokines and granzyme B in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to irritants and sensitizers.
Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Kim HR; Lee KJ; Ryu DY
Toxicology; 2008 Sep; 250(2-3):116-23. PubMed ID: 18652873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in lymphocyte subsets after treatment with cyclophosphamide and during the development of contact sensitivity in the guinea pig.
Baker D; Karcher K; Antoniou AV; Turk JL; Tan BT; Scheper RJ
Int J Immunopharmacol; 1987; 9(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 2884193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of mouse strains using the local lymph node assay.
Woolhiser MR; Munson AE; Meade BJ
Toxicology; 2000 May; 146(2-3):221-7. PubMed ID: 10814854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Mandervelt C; Clottens FL; Demedts M; Nemery B
Toxicology; 1997 Jun; 120(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9160110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2788401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Divergent immunological responses following glutaraldehyde exposure.
Azadi S; Klink KJ; Meade BJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2004 May; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15126069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Evans P; Harvey P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1998; 18(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 9719428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sodium metasilicate hypersensitivity in BALB/c mice.
Karrow NA; Guo TL; Leffel EK; Zhang LX; McCay JA; Germolec DR; White KL
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Sep; 13(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12165932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Local lymph node assays.
Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2004; Chapter 18():Unit18.2. PubMed ID: 23045102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A modification of the local lymph node assay for contact allergenicity screening: measurement of interleukin-2 as an alternative to radioisotope-dependent proliferation assay.
Hatao M; Hariya T; Katsumura Y; Kato S
Toxicology; 1995 Apr; 98(1-3):15-22. PubMed ID: 7740543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers.
Williams WC; Copeland C; Boykin E; Quell SJ; Lehmann DM
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gene expression profiles in auricle skin as a possible additional endpoint for determination of sensitizers: A multi-endpoint evaluation of the local lymph node assay.
Tsuchiyama H; Maeda A; Nakajima M; Kitsukawa M; Takahashi K; Miyoshi T; Mutsuga M; Asaoka Y; Miyamoto Y; Oshida K
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 280():133-141. PubMed ID: 28826779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cytometric profile of molybdenum-induced contact sensitization versus a strong allergen reaction to oxazolone in murine auricular lymph node (ALN) test.
Abdouh M; Krzystyniak K; Flipo D; Thérien HM; Fournier M
Int J Immunopharmacol; 1995 Jul; 17(7):545-54. PubMed ID: 8586482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Chaney JG; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 12151637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
