354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737764)
1. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
Giannelli PC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
Perry C
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rock v. Arkansas: hypnosis, the defendant's privilege.
Orne MT; Dinges DF; Orne EC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):250-65. PubMed ID: 2258243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
Perry C; Laurence JR
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rock v. Arkansas: a critique.
Udolf R
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 2258242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The admissibility of hypnotically enhanced testimony. Have the courts been mesmerized?
Henderson MD
J Leg Med; 1985 Sep; 6(3):293-335. PubMed ID: 3877135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional rights and hypnotically elicited testimony.
Newman AW; Thompson JW
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 10212035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: a brief communication.
Labelle L; Lamarche MC; Laurence JR
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 2258247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spontaneous hypnosis in the forensic context.
Beahrs JO
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 2667657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
Krauss DA; Scurich N
Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vickie Lorene Rock, petitioner v. Arkansas on writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas [June 22, 1987].
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):219-38. PubMed ID: 2258241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A reversal of hypnotically "refreshed" testimony: a brief communication.
Levitt EE
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Jan; 38(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 2295534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rethinking per se exclusions of hypnotically elicited recall as legal testimony.
Perry C; Orne MT; London RW; Orne EC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jan; 44(1):66-81. PubMed ID: 8582779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Juror and expert conceptions of battered women.
Dodge M; Greene E
Violence Vict; 1991; 6(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 1822697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the forensic expert in criminal procedures according to Belgian Law.
Vermylen Y
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):8-13. PubMed ID: 20471763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The presentation of expert testimony via live audio-visual communication.
Miller RD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 2039847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
