These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737916)

  • 1. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behavioral auditory thresholds for sinusoidal electrical stimuli in the cat.
    Smith DW; Watt S; Konrad KE; Olszyk VB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 7608401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.
    Beitel RE; Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10686430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time.
    Miller CA; Faulkner MJ; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):100-11. PubMed ID: 8647732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.
    Smith DW; Finley CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2228-37. PubMed ID: 9348680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J; Hartmann R; Syka J; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
    Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Rebscher SJ; Snyder RL; Leake PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2035-48. PubMed ID: 11386556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.