These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7737928)

  • 1. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an active nonlinear model of the cochlea.
    Fukazawa T; Tanaka Y
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):42-8. PubMed ID: 7737928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions.
    Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):170-7. PubMed ID: 8647740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: a model.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 8647730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion product emissions from a cochlear model with nonlinear mechanoelectrical transduction in outer hair cells.
    Liu YW; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2420-32. PubMed ID: 20370025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3559-71. PubMed ID: 15658707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.
    Bowling T; Wen H; Meenderink SWF; Dong W; Meaud J
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13651. PubMed ID: 34211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One source for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generated by low- and high-level primaries.
    Lukashkin AN; Lukashkina VA; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2740-8. PubMed ID: 12083209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback.
    Carvalho S; Mom T; Gilain L; Avan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1639-48. PubMed ID: 15478430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model of cochlear micromechanics.
    Fukazawa T
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):182-90. PubMed ID: 9387997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation place of the long- and short-latency components of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear cochlear model.
    Moleti A; Al-Maamury AM; Bertaccini D; Botti T; Sisto R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4098-108. PubMed ID: 23742362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Otoacoustic" emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback.
    Zwicker E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jul; 80(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 3745661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does the inner ear generate distortion product otoacoustic emissions?. Results from a realistic model of the human cochlea.
    Vetesnik A; Nobili R; Gummer A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 17065828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the active process of the cochlea: phase relations, amplification, and spontaneous oscillation.
    Markin VS; Hudspeth AJ
    Biophys J; 1995 Jul; 69(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 7669891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.
    Liu YW; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):951-61. PubMed ID: 23363112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.