These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occasion-setting training renders stimuli more similar: acquired equivalence between the targets of feature-positive discriminations. Bonardi C; Hall G Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Feb; 47(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 8165326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: roles of sensory preconditioning and latent inhibition. RodrÃguez G; Alonso G Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 17728074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective transfer of responding in conditional discriminations. Wilson PN; Pearce JM Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 Feb; 42(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 2326493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus. Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning. Wilson PN; Pearce JM Q J Exp Psychol B; 1989 Aug; 41(3):243-73. PubMed ID: 2798927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blocked and test-stimulus exposure effects in perceptual learning re-examined. Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB Behav Processes; 2004 Apr; 66(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15062968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Summation: further assessment of a configural theory. Pearce JM; George DN; Aydin A Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Jan; 55(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 11900307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus. Cunningham CL J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 7288371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Savings tests: separating differences in rate of learning from differences in initial levels. Rescorla RA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 12395494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure. Hall G; Honey RC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 2398338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Holland PC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):476-97. PubMed ID: 6491608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learned irrelevance is not the sum of exposure to CS and US. Bennett CH; Maldonado A; Mackintosh NJ Q J Exp Psychol B; 1995 May; 48(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 7597194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditions favoring superconditioning of irrelevant conditioned stimuli. Williams DA; Mehta R; Dumont JL J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 15078124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]